<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Makeover Madness for Children&#039;s Cartoons? Less belly fat, more muscles, and a cell phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Dr. Robyn Silverman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:38:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lizzie</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-608</guid>
		<description>I know this topic is really old, but that isn&#039;t what strawberry shortcake looks like. And so what if they are dressed like that you old ladies need to keep up with the times. The toy companies are not trying to get your baby girl pregnant at 15 with their scantily clad dolls they are just trying to make a profit. If they were to make a stay-at-home barbie who dresses down to her ankles you would be absolutely offended. There really is no winning with the uptight parents of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this topic is really old, but that isn&#8217;t what strawberry shortcake looks like. And so what if they are dressed like that you old ladies need to keep up with the times. The toy companies are not trying to get your baby girl pregnant at 15 with their scantily clad dolls they are just trying to make a profit. If they were to make a stay-at-home barbie who dresses down to her ankles you would be absolutely offended. There really is no winning with the uptight parents of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connie</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-607</guid>
		<description>hi! im connie and im 15 so i have actually played with bratz for a few of my last doll playing years and i really loved them, they were cool! ALL the girls at school had bratz!i also used to love my barbies, and that mean i can see the real differances behind the two.

no offence to you guys, but your kinda older and all talk about &quot;back when you were little..&quot;  which is fine, and yeah you have kids who you can talk too aswell but still, ive been with both : )

i remember having fairy princess barbie, in her long pink puffy dress, and vet barbie and inflatable blow up chair barbie (yah...it existed) plus there was the pink house and the beach jeep and the farm animal set to go with em all! with bratz i had rockstars, and couture pirates and surfer chiks. in my eyes, bratz were cooler.

now that i look back on it they are kinda yucky lookin and the clothes are racy, but you dont notice that as a kid much. its just the clothes that are given with the cool new doll, are cool aswell. and i reckon if the makers of bratz marketed NEW clothes, less &quot;racy&quot; ones, girls will still like them. i mean people on tv and in the world wore racy clothing and acted &quot;lewd&quot; sometimes too when you were little right? its just that doll companies didnt have dolls dressed up as topless hippies or something like that.

oh and id also like to say that strawberry shortcake looks adorable with her makover! so what if she doesant have a cat! is that gonna suddenly make her a bad influence to kids? and cellphones arent bad are they? i mean your duaghters have probs seen you use a mobile yourself tonnes of times. plus arent parants always goin on about their kids eating more fruit anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi! im connie and im 15 so i have actually played with bratz for a few of my last doll playing years and i really loved them, they were cool! ALL the girls at school had bratz!i also used to love my barbies, and that mean i can see the real differances behind the two.</p>
<p>no offence to you guys, but your kinda older and all talk about &#8220;back when you were little..&#8221;  which is fine, and yeah you have kids who you can talk too aswell but still, ive been with both : )</p>
<p>i remember having fairy princess barbie, in her long pink puffy dress, and vet barbie and inflatable blow up chair barbie (yah&#8230;it existed) plus there was the pink house and the beach jeep and the farm animal set to go with em all! with bratz i had rockstars, and couture pirates and surfer chiks. in my eyes, bratz were cooler.</p>
<p>now that i look back on it they are kinda yucky lookin and the clothes are racy, but you dont notice that as a kid much. its just the clothes that are given with the cool new doll, are cool aswell. and i reckon if the makers of bratz marketed NEW clothes, less &#8220;racy&#8221; ones, girls will still like them. i mean people on tv and in the world wore racy clothing and acted &#8220;lewd&#8221; sometimes too when you were little right? its just that doll companies didnt have dolls dressed up as topless hippies or something like that.</p>
<p>oh and id also like to say that strawberry shortcake looks adorable with her makover! so what if she doesant have a cat! is that gonna suddenly make her a bad influence to kids? and cellphones arent bad are they? i mean your duaghters have probs seen you use a mobile yourself tonnes of times. plus arent parants always goin on about their kids eating more fruit anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savannah</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>savannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-606</guid>
		<description>i love your movie so much and i cant wait for the 2 one to come out that one is going to be so good your biggest fan savannah     p.s that yellow fish is such a scardy cat lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love your movie so much and i cant wait for the 2 one to come out that one is going to be so good your biggest fan savannah     p.s that yellow fish is such a scardy cat lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Girls Are Confused about Body Size: Body Image Messages &#171; Dr. Robyn Silverman&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Girls Are Confused about Body Size: Body Image Messages &#171; Dr. Robyn Silverman&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-605</guid>
		<description>[...] Rule out comparisons with celebrities and models: What you and your family sees on TV or in the magazines is not the “real world” and often is simply…”not real.” To compare your body type and size with Paris Hilton is about as scientific as comparing it with Strawberry Shortcake. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rule out comparisons with celebrities and models: What you and your family sees on TV or in the magazines is not the “real world” and often is simply…”not real.” To compare your body type and size with Paris Hilton is about as scientific as comparing it with Strawberry Shortcake. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaping Youth</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaping Youth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-604</guid>
		<description>#
Shaping Youth, on June 17th, 2008 at 12:51 am Said:

Actually, if you look at some of the TV archives, some of the retro cartoons are equally sexed up…Betty Boop and the teeny weeny waisted black and white ad icons of the 50s, and color iconic Jetsons and Wilmas and I Dream of Jeannies of the 60s, etc.—But the difference to me is this:

Our current media POP CULTURE in general is so overtly hypersexualized that the CONTEXT shifts into toxic terrain…
What might have once been ‘just a cartoon’ is now an aspirational model of expectation and normative cues with surround sound exposure of shoulds and coulds and ‘oughtas’ which we didn’t have blaring in Dolby back then.

In fact, when the S.F. Chronicle ran this article re: overhauling the Nancy Drew icon and ’sexed her up’ to maker her relevant for ‘today,’ I wrote this letter to the editor:

“Nancy Drew needs updated body image” Editor — Kudos to talented artist Sho Murase for the superhero update (”Now 75, sleuth Nancy Drew looks younger, hipper in graphic novels drawn by S.F. artist Sho Murase,” Sept. 2), but why not update body image messaging while we’re at it?

It saddens me that the worldview for our daughters repeatedly gravitates to the doe-eyed, chest-thrusting, teeny-waisted teen as an “aspirational” illustrative icon.

Granted, Sho’s new Nancy Drew is at least fully clothed (unlike the cleavage-baring, nearly naked “Lara Croft, Tomb Raider”), but the ample bosom drawn under her tight sweater-hugging style will feed an entirely new generation of angst-ridden girls wondering why they don’t look like that.

Let’s show some responsibility in our media messaging. I’m not asking for “realism,” but if we’re going to overhaul outdated images and story lines, the least we could do is make the new characters more positive.”

Oh, yeah, in case you want to see what Miss Nancy looks like in anime now, check her out here:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2005/09/02/DDGN5EF0BM79.DTL&amp;o=2

AMY JUSSEL, Founder, Exec. Director Shaping Youth.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
Shaping Youth, on June 17th, 2008 at 12:51 am Said:</p>
<p>Actually, if you look at some of the TV archives, some of the retro cartoons are equally sexed up…Betty Boop and the teeny weeny waisted black and white ad icons of the 50s, and color iconic Jetsons and Wilmas and I Dream of Jeannies of the 60s, etc.—But the difference to me is this:</p>
<p>Our current media POP CULTURE in general is so overtly hypersexualized that the CONTEXT shifts into toxic terrain…<br />
What might have once been ‘just a cartoon’ is now an aspirational model of expectation and normative cues with surround sound exposure of shoulds and coulds and ‘oughtas’ which we didn’t have blaring in Dolby back then.</p>
<p>In fact, when the S.F. Chronicle ran this article re: overhauling the Nancy Drew icon and ’sexed her up’ to maker her relevant for ‘today,’ I wrote this letter to the editor:</p>
<p>“Nancy Drew needs updated body image” Editor — Kudos to talented artist Sho Murase for the superhero update (”Now 75, sleuth Nancy Drew looks younger, hipper in graphic novels drawn by S.F. artist Sho Murase,” Sept. 2), but why not update body image messaging while we’re at it?</p>
<p>It saddens me that the worldview for our daughters repeatedly gravitates to the doe-eyed, chest-thrusting, teeny-waisted teen as an “aspirational” illustrative icon.</p>
<p>Granted, Sho’s new Nancy Drew is at least fully clothed (unlike the cleavage-baring, nearly naked “Lara Croft, Tomb Raider”), but the ample bosom drawn under her tight sweater-hugging style will feed an entirely new generation of angst-ridden girls wondering why they don’t look like that.</p>
<p>Let’s show some responsibility in our media messaging. I’m not asking for “realism,” but if we’re going to overhaul outdated images and story lines, the least we could do is make the new characters more positive.”</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, in case you want to see what Miss Nancy looks like in anime now, check her out here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2005/09/02/DDGN5EF0BM79.DTL&amp;o=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2005/09/02/DDGN5EF0BM79.DTL&amp;o=2</a></p>
<p>AMY JUSSEL, Founder, Exec. Director Shaping Youth.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parents for Ethical Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Parents for Ethical Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-603</guid>
		<description>...The New York Times reports on the most recent toy makeovers, including Strawberry Shortcake (click for the must-see visual).  As described at &lt;a href=&quot;http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2008/06/11/leave-my-childhood-alone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The F-Word&lt;/a&gt;:

    The new, “improved” Strawberry Shortcake’s adorable chubby cheeks have been noticeably thinned out, her pudgy nose realigned into a perky little point, her signature red kinky hair straightened into hot pink silky tresses, and her frilly bloomers replaced with, well, I don’t even want to speculate on what’s beneath that mid-thigh-high dress — even her cat is thinner.

Good thing that cartoonish body images don’t affect little girls! Oh, wait. &lt;a href=&quot;http://kissmyassets.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/nip-tuck-for-strawberry-shortcake-and-friends-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cellphone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Never mind.&lt;/a&gt;

Marketing to kids has become a competitive business. So here’s some great! ideas! on how to capture kids’ attention! But please, if I read one more article on marketing to children with the tagline it isn’t child’s play I’m going to throw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;The New York Times reports on the most recent toy makeovers, including Strawberry Shortcake (click for the must-see visual).  As described at <a href="http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2008/06/11/leave-my-childhood-alone/" rel="nofollow">The F-Word</a>:</p>
<p>    The new, “improved” Strawberry Shortcake’s adorable chubby cheeks have been noticeably thinned out, her pudgy nose realigned into a perky little point, her signature red kinky hair straightened into hot pink silky tresses, and her frilly bloomers replaced with, well, I don’t even want to speculate on what’s beneath that mid-thigh-high dress — even her cat is thinner.</p>
<p>Good thing that cartoonish body images don’t affect little girls! Oh, wait. <a href="http://kissmyassets.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/nip-tuck-for-strawberry-shortcake-and-friends-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cellphone/" rel="nofollow">Never mind.</a></p>
<p>Marketing to kids has become a competitive business. So here’s some great! ideas! on how to capture kids’ attention! But please, if I read one more article on marketing to children with the tagline it isn’t child’s play I’m going to throw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drrobyn</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>drrobyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Yes, I can see what you&#039;re getting at...Pocahontas definately doesn&#039;t appear too young and innocent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/pocahont.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Dr. Robyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I can see what you&#8217;re getting at&#8230;Pocahontas definately doesn&#8217;t appear too young and innocent <a href="http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/pocahont.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Dr. Robyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign of the Girl Child</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Reign of the Girl Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-601</guid>
		<description>No doubt about it, cartoons are certainly being sexed-up, beefed-up and toned-up to
fit in with popular culture&#039;s ideal of beauty.  I remember seeing this trend start
with  Disney&#039;s  Pocohantas, who was touted as being the most &quot;beautiful and
realistically proportined Disney heroine ever... &quot; (I actually remember that from
their promotion of the movie!). Forget the fact that the real Pocahontas was a girl
of 11 or 12, not a voluptuous glamazon in an off-the-shoulder mini-dress.

Does it have an impact on our kids? BIG TIME. I just had a conversation with a
co-worker whose perfectly fit and healthy 9-year-old daughter mentioned that she
would be in the basement &quot;working out her abs.&quot;

Should toy/cartoon developers move with the times to remain relevant? Certainly..but
with everyone offering the same, limited ideals (youth, beauty, fame, wealth, and
&quot;hotness&quot; as  king) our kids are getting a raw deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it, cartoons are certainly being sexed-up, beefed-up and toned-up to<br />
fit in with popular culture&#8217;s ideal of beauty.  I remember seeing this trend start<br />
with  Disney&#8217;s  Pocohantas, who was touted as being the most &#8220;beautiful and<br />
realistically proportined Disney heroine ever&#8230; &#8221; (I actually remember that from<br />
their promotion of the movie!). Forget the fact that the real Pocahontas was a girl<br />
of 11 or 12, not a voluptuous glamazon in an off-the-shoulder mini-dress.</p>
<p>Does it have an impact on our kids? BIG TIME. I just had a conversation with a<br />
co-worker whose perfectly fit and healthy 9-year-old daughter mentioned that she<br />
would be in the basement &#8220;working out her abs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Should toy/cartoon developers move with the times to remain relevant? Certainly..but<br />
with everyone offering the same, limited ideals (youth, beauty, fame, wealth, and<br />
&#8220;hotness&#8221; as  king) our kids are getting a raw deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drrobyn</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>drrobyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Thank-you, Norn.  I do like the fruit part much better than downing the pastries.  Did you see the Today Show clip yesterday about obesity and children?  One of the pieces of information they gave was that fruit is now the most popular snack-- beating out cookies, the most popular snack of the past.  But what got me so annoyed was that they were saying in the analysis of obesity in California, the richest county had an obesity rate of 10%, well below the average, while the poorest county had a rate of 32%.  Now that&#039;s saying something about the availability of fruit (and other quality, nutritious items) to people of all economic backgrounds.

Anyway, I think you are correct in saying that our children today are moving at the speed of light-- learning more than we ever could and in such unique ways.  We do need to evolve and make sure pop culture evolves along with them.

My concern is-- what becomes too much?  As Vicki was saying, when we continue to push the envelope, when will it go too far-- or will it?  As parents we will now tolerate so much more that our parents and their parents would have.  If we could pop into the future, will Strawberry Shortcake wind up with a horse that looks like the Struts (w)horses?  Hmmm.

For now, there are some positive changes (i.e. fruit. no more yarn hair) but I wonder where it will all go.  What&#039;s with the &quot;more muscles&quot; in the TMNT?  Necessary?  Longer eyelashes and less belly fat in the care bears?  I mean, they are just sweat little teddy bears-- not work out bears.  Who wants to give a squeeze to a hard, boney bear?

There are positives and negatives to most of these advancements.  We&#039;ll just have to see where it goes in the future.  Hopefully, the adults will keep their heads and childhood will still reflect some important concepts...innocence and fun.

Dr. Robyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank-you, Norn.  I do like the fruit part much better than downing the pastries.  Did you see the Today Show clip yesterday about obesity and children?  One of the pieces of information they gave was that fruit is now the most popular snack&#8211; beating out cookies, the most popular snack of the past.  But what got me so annoyed was that they were saying in the analysis of obesity in California, the richest county had an obesity rate of 10%, well below the average, while the poorest county had a rate of 32%.  Now that&#8217;s saying something about the availability of fruit (and other quality, nutritious items) to people of all economic backgrounds.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think you are correct in saying that our children today are moving at the speed of light&#8211; learning more than we ever could and in such unique ways.  We do need to evolve and make sure pop culture evolves along with them.</p>
<p>My concern is&#8211; what becomes too much?  As Vicki was saying, when we continue to push the envelope, when will it go too far&#8211; or will it?  As parents we will now tolerate so much more that our parents and their parents would have.  If we could pop into the future, will Strawberry Shortcake wind up with a horse that looks like the Struts (w)horses?  Hmmm.</p>
<p>For now, there are some positive changes (i.e. fruit. no more yarn hair) but I wonder where it will all go.  What&#8217;s with the &#8220;more muscles&#8221; in the TMNT?  Necessary?  Longer eyelashes and less belly fat in the care bears?  I mean, they are just sweat little teddy bears&#8211; not work out bears.  Who wants to give a squeeze to a hard, boney bear?</p>
<p>There are positives and negatives to most of these advancements.  We&#8217;ll just have to see where it goes in the future.  Hopefully, the adults will keep their heads and childhood will still reflect some important concepts&#8230;innocence and fun.</p>
<p>Dr. Robyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts and Tummytucks</title>
		<link>http://www.drrobynsilverman.com/body-image/makeover-madness-for-childrens-cartoons-less-belly-fat-more-muscles-and-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts and Tummytucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drrobyn.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts &amp; Tummytucks « Choose MOGO, on June 13th, 2008 at 6:08 am Said

[...] Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts &amp; Tummytucks Posted on June 12, 2008 by pdxmogo Ah, childhood. The fun, the games, the high heels, the weight control regimens, the thong underwear, the moms and tots classes for practicing come hither looks. In case you haven’t been paying attention, the products being marketed to our kids have gotten a major facelift (and lipo), and the ‘tudes they’re promoting have become more than a little sexualized. When I saw this article (free registration required) in the NY Times about “beloved” characters being “reimagined” for the 21st century, I was inspired to write about it, but then I saw that Dr. Robyn over at Kiss My Assets beat me to it and wrote a great post analyzing this new trend. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts &amp; Tummytucks « Choose MOGO, on June 13th, 2008 at 6:08 am Said</p>
<p>[...] Of Tots, Tweens, Tarts &amp; Tummytucks Posted on June 12, 2008 by pdxmogo Ah, childhood. The fun, the games, the high heels, the weight control regimens, the thong underwear, the moms and tots classes for practicing come hither looks. In case you haven’t been paying attention, the products being marketed to our kids have gotten a major facelift (and lipo), and the ‘tudes they’re promoting have become more than a little sexualized. When I saw this article (free registration required) in the NY Times about “beloved” characters being “reimagined” for the 21st century, I was inspired to write about it, but then I saw that Dr. Robyn over at Kiss My Assets beat me to it and wrote a great post analyzing this new trend. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
